<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Natasha Friis Saxberg &#187; crisis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://natasha.saxberg.dk/tag/crisis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://natasha.saxberg.dk</link>
	<description>Founder of Mentory. Partner in Webcom. Affiliated at Copenhagen Institute for Futures Studies. Co-author of a Twitter book.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:23:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>To be or not to (b)equity</title>
		<link>http://natasha.saxberg.dk/2008/10/31/to-be-or-not-to-bequity/</link>
		<comments>http://natasha.saxberg.dk/2008/10/31/to-be-or-not-to-bequity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>natasha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crisis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natasha.saxberg.dk/?p=53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rumor has it we have a crisis. Annoying for those who needs to sell their house (yours truly) just now. But I am sure that the folks that have been listening to us bragging about our risen equity for the last 5 years, probably are thinking, ha &#8211; now your not so cocky. I met with a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><span>Rumor has it we have a <a title="crisis" href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article5013331.ece">crisis</a>. Annoying for those who needs to sell their house (yours truly) just now. But I am sure that the folks that have been listening to us bragging about our risen equity for the last 5 years, probably are thinking, ha &#8211; now your not so cocky. I met with a (renting) friend who said, &#8220;I haven&#8217;t been to a gathering for the last 5 years without listening to equity&#8221;, so maybe it´s finally possible to talk about something interesting again.</span></div>
<div><span><br />
</span></div>
<div><span>And is it so bad, did it make us/me happy, better dressed maybe. The eager to earn money had a price &#8211; on what really matters. And the good thing about down-times are that you have to prioritize whats really important. And the up site to that is that it´s mainstream acceptable to be provident again. All the non-important stuff can be put away, and make some space for good (free) social time with family and friends.</span></div>
<div><span><br />
</span></div>
<div><span>So walking to work in my already old-fashioned boots, it´s somehow the same game that´s going on in the companies. Most companies are dismissing a lot of employees, using the down-times as an excuse. But is it not just a really good chance to prioritize expenses &#8211; while it´s mainstream acceptable? You can not open a newspaper without reading about mass firing - I bet it would have demanded a lot more explanation just 6 months ago. </span></div>
<div><span><br />
</span></div>
<div><span>And I actually praise this development, because it´s when you focus on what&#8217;s important, potential of opportunity rises &#8211; i.e innovation &#8211; and who can be an opponent to that?</span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://natasha.saxberg.dk/2008/10/31/to-be-or-not-to-bequity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
