Pattern of random

By natasha On May 27, 2008 · 3 Comments

I have noticed the pattern of random, sounds contradictory? Yet – if I have a meeting with a special agenda ore something certain is in my interest, I am pretty sure that an article pops into my inbox, or I meet a past colleague on the train who works within that area of interest � - and so on.

Some might say it is the power of focus, but is it so predictable that we can map it, fit it into a pattern, and connect individuals with the same traces, so the masses gives you the answers…. Far out?

Maybe – but I am using lifestream at twitter to tell what’s cooking in my kitchen, the words in my e-mails might show some weight, my search on Google- and so on, that should be sufficient enough to send some pings out on cyberspace, and what are the chance of a random temporary soul mate…

�

3 Responses to Pattern of random

Jørgen Toldst says:
February 5, 2009 at 12:10
Sounds like Jungs Synchronicity, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synchronicity
Reply
Natasha Friis Saxber says:
February 5, 2009 at 12:10
Great feedback – it is exactly the schism. Really interesting – i must look into Jung.
Reply
Twitter – Chaotic, random but relevant | Natasha Friis Saxberg says:
July 1, 2009 at 11:40
[...] wrote a blog post in 2008 about the “Pattern of random” that received a comment on the similarity with Synchronicity (by Jung). And after reading the [...]
Reply