<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: International conference about open standards</title> <atom:link href="http://natasha.saxberg.dk/2006/01/19/international-conference-about-open-standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://natasha.saxberg.dk/2006/01/19/international-conference-about-open-standards/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Jeff Kaplan</title><link>http://natasha.saxberg.dk/2006/01/19/international-conference-about-open-standards/#comment-7</link> <dc:creator>Jeff Kaplan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:10:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://natasha.saxberg.dk/?p=6#comment-7</guid> <description>This was a very nice summary of key issues raised at the conference.  And I also loved that quote about not feeling the chains if you  don&#039;t move.
I also like the idea:  If you&#039;re not interested in open technologies, you&#039;re not paying attention.
Have you seen any discussion of OpenDocument Format in Denmark?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a very nice summary of key issues raised at the conference.  And I also loved that quote about not feeling the chains if you  don&#039;t move.</p><p>I also like the idea:  If you&#039;re not interested in open technologies, you&#039;re not paying attention.</p><p>Have you seen any discussion of OpenDocument Format in Denmark?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Natasha</title><link>http://natasha.saxberg.dk/2006/01/19/international-conference-about-open-standards/#comment-8</link> <dc:creator>Natasha</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:10:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://natasha.saxberg.dk/?p=6#comment-8</guid> <description>I asked Microsoft if they had considered &lt;span lang=&quot;EN-GB&quot; style=&quot;font-size: 12pt&quot; /&gt;ODF in Office 2007. They haven&#180;t, but instead they have created there own standard, Office Open XML. The argument is compatibility with former versions.
Microsoft apparently had a hard time defending this standard on a Danish Linux Conference, &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; onclick=&quot;return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)&quot; href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.dk/art/32984?a=rss&amp;i=0&quot;&gt;http://www.computerworld.dk/art/32984?a=rss&amp;i=0&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I asked Microsoft if they had considered &lt;span lang=&quot;EN-GB&quot; style=&quot;font-size: 12pt&quot; /&gt;ODF in Office 2007. They haven&acute;t, but instead they have created there own standard, Office Open XML. The argument is compatibility with former versions.</p><p>Microsoft apparently had a hard time defending this standard on a Danish Linux Conference, &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; onclick=&quot;return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)&quot; href=&quot;<a
href="http://www.computerworld.dk/art/32984?a=rss&#038;i=0&quot;&gt;http://www.computerworld.dk/art/32984?a=rss&#038;i=0&lt;/a&#038;gt" rel="nofollow">http://www.computerworld.dk/art/32984?a=rss&#038;i=0&quot;&gt;http://www.computerworld.dk/art/32984?a=rss&#038;i=0&lt;/a&#038;gt</a>;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Natasha</title><link>http://natasha.saxberg.dk/2006/01/19/international-conference-about-open-standards/#comment-6</link> <dc:creator>Natasha</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 08:57:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://natasha.saxberg.dk/?p=6#comment-6</guid> <description>I asked Microsoft if they had considered ODF in Office 2007. They haven´t, but instead they have created there own standard, Office Open XML. The argument is compatibility with former versions.
Microsoft apparently had a hard time defending this standard on a Danish Linux Conference, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.dk/art/32984?a=rss&amp;i=0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.computerworld.dk/art/32984?a=rss&amp;i=0&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I asked Microsoft if they had considered ODF in Office 2007. They haven´t, but instead they have created there own standard, Office Open XML. The argument is compatibility with former versions.</p><p>Microsoft apparently had a hard time defending this standard on a Danish Linux Conference, <a
href="http://www.computerworld.dk/art/32984?a=rss&amp;i=0" rel="nofollow">http://www.computerworld.dk/art/32984?a=rss&#038;i=0</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Natasha</title><link>http://natasha.saxberg.dk/2006/01/19/international-conference-about-open-standards/#comment-5</link> <dc:creator>Natasha</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 08:59:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://natasha.saxberg.dk/?p=6#comment-5</guid> <description>And thank you for your very interesting contribution on the conference. I hope you found a interpreter.
There is an ODF debate, and it seems increasing. SSLUG (a Danish/Swedish Linux User group, http://www.sslug.dk/front/sidstenyt.rss) has several comments on the subject. And it seems like the vendors are paying attention as well, probably because of customer demand. My world is very Microsoft influenced all though it is a public company, but there is a focus on licence cost, and that could lead to a change over time.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And thank you for your very interesting contribution on the conference. I hope you found a interpreter.</p><p>There is an ODF debate, and it seems increasing. SSLUG (a Danish/Swedish Linux User group, <a
href="http://www.sslug.dk/front/sidstenyt.rss" rel="nofollow">http://www.sslug.dk/front/sidstenyt.rss</a>) has several comments on the subject. And it seems like the vendors are paying attention as well, probably because of customer demand. My world is very Microsoft influenced all though it is a public company, but there is a focus on licence cost, and that could lead to a change over time.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jeff Kaplan</title><link>http://natasha.saxberg.dk/2006/01/19/international-conference-about-open-standards/#comment-4</link> <dc:creator>Jeff Kaplan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:04:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://natasha.saxberg.dk/?p=6#comment-4</guid> <description>This was a very nice summary of key issues raised at the conference.  And I also loved that quote about not feeling the chains if you  don&#039;t move.
I also like the idea:  If you&#039;re not interested in open technologies, you&#039;re not paying attention.
Have you seen any discussion of OpenDocument Format in Denmark?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a very nice summary of key issues raised at the conference.  And I also loved that quote about not feeling the chains if you  don&#8217;t move.</p><p>I also like the idea:  If you&#8217;re not interested in open technologies, you&#8217;re not paying attention.</p><p>Have you seen any discussion of OpenDocument Format in Denmark?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
